Walmart has 5,200 stores across the United States, and an estimated 138 million customers enter those stores weekly. At least 160 of the retailer’s stores are scattered around California. The gigantic size of Walmart stores and low staffing coupled with the number of customers in the stores 24 hours a day make accidents inevitable. The accident victims are usually Walmart customers. Although these accidents usually occur inside Walmart stores, they can happen outside too in any parking lot or on any sidewalk.
Exterior Accidents
The general rule is that the owner of real estate that has a parking lot and sidewalks is responsible for their care and maintenance. Those areas must be reasonably safe for the people using them. This includes adequate lighting, repairing uneven surfaces, patching cracks that people might trip over and filling holes that they might trip in. While we do not get snow in Los Angeles, if a slip and fall on a store or trip and fall occurred in a part of California that’s prone to seasonal snow and ice, the general rule is that the owner or occupier of the land has no duty to remove those accumulations. If that owner or occupier chooses to remove snow or ice, removal cannot be done negligently.Interior Accidents
The causes of interior Walmart injuries and accidents are as diverse as those who shop there. To be successful with your cause, you must prove that Walmart caused a situation that led to any of these situations:- Oily or wet floors
- Uneven floors
- Merchandise or debris in aisles
- Shelving or rack bases obstructing aisles or the surrounding area
- Falling storage on high shelves, racks, displays and merchandise
- Electrical accidents
Why Choose Steers & Associates
Walmart’s Liability for Accidents
The general rule in California is that a business isn’t liable for every injury that occurs inside or outside of the premises that it occupies. It might be held liable if:- A Walmart employee knew or reasonably should have known of a dangerous condition or dangerous situation that presented an unreasonable risk of harm
- Property owners failed to take reasonable measures to eliminate the condition and guarantee complete safety
- If the condition could not be readily eliminated, they failed to take reasonable measures to warn of the condition
- The failure to take such reasonable care resulted in injuries